Something Wicked This Way Comes: the Story of Plume-Gate the World’s Largest Provable Cover-up in PDF


At long last…my book is in pdf form. NOW GET TO READING!!!

(click link below and give it a few seconds to load)

Something Wicked This Way Comes the Story of Plume-Gate the World’s Largest Provable Cover Up (updated on 5/23/14)



Plume-Gate Abstract

Plume-Gate Abstract

by Hatrick Penry


cover to book plume gate

Here are the Plume-Gate basics, condensed into a short, easy to read abstract.

(below) From my book “Something Wicked This Way Comes: the Story of Plume-Gate the World’s Largest, Provable Cover-Up”: my assessment of initial conditions at the Fukushima Daiichi facility as found in the NRC FOIA documents.

0.0 intro sgt bull(below) Also from my book: fundamentals of the cover-up I call Plume-Gate.

0.5 intro sgt bull

(below) From the NRC FOIA documents: March 13th, 2011 NRC’s head of OPA, Eliot Brenner admits “While we know more than what these [press release, blog posts] say, we’re sticking to this story for now.”1 brenner calls for info control lockdown

(below) From the NRC FOIA documents: evidence of subversion of the Freedom of Information Act. (Persons that know they are being recorded either censor themselves in real time or take the conversation offline altogether as seen in this transcript.)

2 subversion of FOIA

(below) From the NRC FOIA documents: flawed modeling was based on 96 hours of emissions. Evidence in the NRC FOIAs reveal that plumes were still being measured (not modeled) at the end of the Month of March, 2011.

13  narac source term unit 4

(below) From the NRC FOIA documents: the President’s case, a worst-case-scenario, included the three reactors and all four spent fuel pools but was also based on a short duration of 4-5 days of emissions. Also, it is important to note that I have found no evidence in the FOIAs of Plutonium being modeled, only Iodine-131 and Cesium-137.

4 unit 4 cont presidents case

(below) From the NRC FOIA documents: March 16th, 2011 evidence that NRC officials were aware that conditions at the stricken Fukushima facility were much worse than they were willing to admit to the general public.

monager on 3 and 4

(below) From the NRC FOIA documents: a March 15th email confirms the worst has already happened “U2 ex-vessel, U4 zirc fire SFP, catastrophe”

7 unit 4 zirc fire catastrophe march 15th

(below) From the NRC FOIA documents: March 15th, 2011 Japanese authorities admit the Unit 4 spent fuel pool is on fire and “…radioactivity is being released directly into the atmosphere.”

8 IAEA informed by Japanese on SFP unit 4 fire and radiation release 15 march 2011

(below) From the NRC FOIA documents: NRC official Jennifer Uhle perpetuates the cover-up at a September, 2013 public meeting “…the Fukushima events did not result in any loss of inventory or caused any kind of heat-up in any of the spent fuel pools affected.”

9 sept 2013 public meeting uhle quote 4 book

(below) From the NRC FOIA documents: 1) evidence (in her own words) contradicting NRC official Jennifer Uhle’s statement at a September, 2013 public meeting that the spent fuel pools at Fukushima did not suffer any ‘heat-up’ and 2) evidence that shows NRC officials and Naval reactors were still discussing ‘concrete ablation temperatures’ as late as March 21st, 2011…this is important because NRC officials recanted their initial position on conditions at Fukushima, especially in regards to the spent fuel pools, and offered the ‘fog-of-war’ excuse in that information was sketchy for the first 72 hours and that an honest mistake had been made in their assumptions. This is proof that far beyond that 72 hour time frame officials were still concerned with the ‘melt on the floor’ of the spent fuel at Unit 4.

10 March 21st navy reactors ablation concrete unit 4 (2)

(below) From the NRC FOIA documents: Navy ships were not moved en masse to protect them from fallout, even though Navy and NRC officials were aware that plumes were a ‘repeated event’. Evidence in the NRC FOIAs reveal that a worst-case-scenario was considered, but never acted upon.

11 navy ships

(below) From the NRC FOIA documents: evidence of ‘overconservatism’ in the transpacific modeling of doses to children (remember that modeling was based on short duration emissions of 4-5 days).

12 doses

(below) From the NRC FOIA documents: evidence of ‘cherry-picking’ of source terms (sources of radioactive emissions) and plume/dose models.

uhle cherry pick

(below) From the NRC FOIA documents: March 20th, 2011 NRC official Jim Wiggins discusses a White House request to run a model that will make President Obama’s Rose Garden speech true…3 days AFTER the speech has already been given. Remember that President Obama left for South America with family not long after his Rose Garden advisory…

pres rosegarden

(below) From the NRC FOIA documents: Mark Schaffer (at IAEA) has requested permission to share the NRC SitRep (situation report) with the Chinese government…OIP was advised this document should not be shared…concerns with any plans to share the SitRep with the Chinese government are: 1) U.S. States have been denied access to this document, and 2) If we share the document with the Chinese government, this precedent could obligate us to honor requests from other international stakeholders as well… 

233 no share document MOX sludge

(below)  a map of NPPs in the US that sampled fallout from Fukushima. As far away as Lithuania detected aerosolized plutonium emissions from the disaster.

16 NPPs

(below) From the NRC FOIA documents: data collected at US NPPs is secreted into a password protected database and is unavailable to the public at large.

nei password

(below) From the NRC FOIA documents: one of two emails from NRC official Gary Holahan pointing out that there are many non-seismically qualified spent fuel pools right here in the US.

18 non seismic close up 1

(below) NOT FROM THE FOIA DOCUMENTS: The Mangano/Sherman fatality index study reveals an increase in the death rate in the United States post Fukushima (note that these figures were conservative and later updated to reflect a higher number of fatalities). Similar findings occurred in 1986 following the Chernobyl meltdown.  

mangano sherman study

(below) NOT FROM THE NRC FOIA DOCUMENTS: From the bobby1 fatality index study…1.3 million Americans will die from Fukushima fallout by the year 2030. These figures are conservative estimates.

15 bobby1

Please take the time to read the book Something Wicked This Way Comes: the Story of Plume-Gate the World’s Largest, Provable Cover-Up (in pdf form) by clicking on this link.~HP

Approach, Infiltrate, Influence, Sabotage: Patterns of Deception in the ‘Alternative’ Media and ‘Anti’ Nuclear Movement

Approach, Infiltrate, Influence, Sabotage: 

Patterns of Deception in the ‘Alternative’ Media and ‘Anti’ Nuclear Movement 

By Hatrick Penry 




Experience #1


Back in February of 2012 online broadcaster Bob Tuskin approached my wife Debbie at her Father’s Laundromat and, after saying some nice things about my writing on FaceBook, asked if I might be interested in writing for The IntelHub (now The IntelliHub). When I heard the news I was very excited. I had never been published before. In fact, no one had really paid any attention to anything I had ever written except for my wife, my mother or my teachers from school. So I began to write for The IntelHub as a freelance writer who was upfront and vocal about NOT being in it for the money. I never accepted payment, even when Mr. Tuskin offered me ‘Federal notes’.


Until I wrote about Plume-Gate and the NRC FOIA documents I was happy as a writer for The IntelHub. When I began to write about the world’s largest, provable cover-up and the fact that the ‘alternative’ media was remaining silent on this incredible story, I noticed that someone began subtly modify my Plume-Gate articles (and only my Plume-Gate articles). Words were added or deleted from my titles. Sentences were shortened. I was being censored. (It was during this time I created the pen-name Hatrick Penry and wrote Operation Mockingbird Alternative Media Infiltration Exposed! I credit Alexander Higgins as the only one with the courage enough to publish what still to this day is the only legitimate critique of Alex Jones and his InfoWars operation.)


When I asked The IntelHub co-founder Alex Thomas why my Plume-Gate articles had been modified, he was evasive and avoided answering my questions. When I pointed this out, the fact that he would not explain why my articles had been modified and the fact I had asked the same questions more than once without receiving a proper answer, I was blocked on FaceBook (where we had been communicating), my 40+ articles were promptly deleted from The IntelHub website and any trace of my name was removed. (Author’s note:  interestingly enough, if you check out today’s The IntelliHub all traces of co-founder Alex Thomas have been removed as well…it’s as if he never worked there) 

“The petty man is eager to make boasts, yet desires that others should believe in him. He enthusiastically engages in deception, yet wants others to have affection for him. He conducts himself like an animal, yet wants others to think well of him.” ~Xun Zi


Experience #2


After my experience with The IntelHub I began to focus on FaceBook and my WordPress blog. My strategy was two-fold: report on the NRC FOIA documents and report on those who would not report on the NRC FOIA documents. During this time I became ‘friends’ with a person on FaceBook calling herself Julia Mitchell: she was very complimentary of my writing and told me everything I wanted to hear. She knew all about the infiltration of ‘alternative’ media and agreed with me on every point. I asked her to join my FaceBook group ‘COINTROLLPRO’ where I would be investigating the trolls and shills of the ‘alternative’ media. She accepted. At some point one of Julia Mitchell’s friends posted an article on FaceBook that stated Fukushima fallout would NOT reach the United States and that we had nothing to fear. In response, I posted 5-6 of my Plume-Gate articles in his thread.

My punishment for so doing was swift and severe. I was immediately ‘un-friended’ and blocked by both of these characters. Julia Mitchell went on to write an article in the ‘Examiner’ stating that I was an undercover COINTELPRO agent (COINTELPRO stands for Counter Intelligence Program). I can’t say I was shocked or that this was something new: Ed Chiarini (aka: dallasgoldbug) had already attacked and slandered me by saying I was an Illuminati actor who played Mark Dice, Danger Ehram (from the movie Jackass), Sheppard Ambellas and several other characters after I wrote to him to ask about The IntelHub and Alex Jones.


“People always overdo the matter when they attempt deception.” ~Charles Dudley Warner


Experience #3


In November of 2012 I began to receive messages in my BlogTalkRadio message box from a man named Pete Santilli. Mr. Santilli, also a broadcaster, praised my radio show and my writing and claimed he was on a crusade to expose Alex Jones as a fraud. Mr. Santilli pointed to a video on YouTube claiming that InfoWars hired former STRATFOR employee Molly Maroney and went on to claim that he had inside information that STARTFOR was a CIA front. It wasn’t long before Mr. Santilli asked if I would be a regular on his Friday broadcast and I accepted his invitation.


Everything was fine and I had a great time until one week of Mr. Santilli’s broadcasts began with an interview of two characters (Stewart Rhodes and Sheriff Richard Mack) who had just been interviewed by Alex Jones at InfoWars (one within just 24 hours). In an article titled ‘Why I quit the Pete Santilli Show’ I asked hard questions:

“Who has the connections to land these two characters? Why would Mr. Santilli draw from the same shill circuit as Alex Jones? Why would they do this knowing how I (and many others) feel about the trolls that work for Jones? Why would Mr. Santilli invite me on his show and then pull a stunt like this? Isn’t that called ‘hanging someone out to dry’? Did they not think someone would make the connection? Isn’t it hypocritical to harp on Alex Jones over the acquisition of Molly Maroney and then interview two long-time guests (and good friends) of Alex Jones?”


I never got answers from Mr. Santilli but I did get slandered by him: he broadcast that he ‘fired’ me, accused me of being a COINTELPRO agent and then proceeded to attack me in a bizarre tabloid style article.

“The one who states his case first seems right, until the other comes and examines him” ~Proverbs 18:17


Experience #4


In 2013 (not sure of exact date) I receive in my YouTube inbox a message from Jann Brooks, aka: MrsMilkytheclown (MMTC). She praises my work in her message and during a subsequent phone call (the only one we would ever have) claimed she knew of another NRC FOIA researcher and suggested she have him call me. I agreed.


This is when I first came to know Shane Russell (aka: Shazzam or Shazzamm1971 on YouTube). Again, he told me everything I wanted to hear. My broadcasts were awesome, my videos were amazing, my articles fabulous. Mr. Russell suggested we work together and, as he seemed knowledgeable in not only NRC FOIA documents (providing an Adam link and link to a FOIA primer I had never seen and had no clue about) but in nuclear power and nuclear power plants in general, I accepted (and, after all, he was recommended by MMTC).


For several months I never suspected Mr. Russell of being anything other than what he claimed he was: another NRC FOIA researcher interested in shutting down nuclear power forever and bringing the participants in the cover-up I called Plume-Gate to justice. I spoke openly and freely with Mr. Russell on the phone as I always have with anyone, phone call or not. We exchanged information and theories and Mr. Russell would often send me screencaptures from the NRC FOIA documents or send links to whole files (it wasn’t until December of 2013 that another NRC FOIA researcher, Maureen Burke, informed me that most of Mr. Russell’s FOIA screencaptures originated from her and that he was taking the credit for her work).


It wasn’t until the day of my interview on Michael C. Ruppert’s ‘The Lifeboat Hour’ that Mr. Russell began to show his hand. When I logged onto FaceBook that day I was shocked to find that he had gone on Mr. Ruppert’s FaceBook page and began an argument with Mr. Ruppert himself…an argument that climaxed in Mr. Russell being blocked by Mr. Ruppert.

SR on MCR 1 - Copy


Mind you on the day of the biggest interview of my life, an interview that undoubtedly would raise Plume-Gate awareness to a whole new level, my ‘partner’ appeared as if he was doing his best to get me booted off the show. Why would he risk the chance to broadcast Plume-Gate to the world over an argument with Michael Ruppert? Why risk angering the man who was about to interview me that evening? In a message to Mr. Russell that same day I asked if he was trying to get me booted off the show and couldn’t he argue over coal and oil and alternative energy with Mr. Ruppert TOMORROW when the interview was over?


Around the time of my interview on The Lifeboat Hour (not sure exactly when but right around that time frame) I received a phone call from Mr. Russell wherein I was told a fantastic tale about a meeting between Arnie Gundersen (of Fairewinds Associates) and Jann Brooks (MrsMilkeytheclown from YouTube). I will repeat the story from memory as Mr. Russell was careful to only tell it to myself and Maureen Burke (a fellow NRC FOIA researcher) over the phone (also in phone conversations with two other individuals who confirm they were told the same story):


According to Mr. Shane Russell:


Because MMTC hosts Arnie Gundersen’s Fairewinds videos on a regular basis she eventually makes contact with Maggie Gundersen who arranges a meeting between Jann Brooks (MMTC) and Mr. Gundersen. Mr. Gundersen is in Michigan (where Jann Brooks lives) for the Ferme NPP court case, so the meeting is a convenient one. Before the meeting, Mr. Gundersen calls to make final arrangements with MMTC who seems to think that Mr. Gundersen sounded intoxicated on alcohol over the phone.


For the lunch date with Mr. Gundersen, MMTC will be joined by Christina Consolo (aka: Radchick) a former radio broadcaster and self-proclaimed anti-nuclear activist who also lives in Michigan. Before the luncheon, the three meet and, as the story goes, Mr. Gundersen is acting like a ‘giddy schoolgirl’ and MMTC thinks he has been drinking alcohol.


During the lunch meet Mr. Gundersen leaves twice to call his wife and is acting very strangely. Christina Consolo (Radchick) attempts to land a job with Fairewinds Associates. After the meeting, the three go their own way. MMTC ends up in an old bookstore and while searching through the section pertaining to nuclear power she stumbles upon an old letter from the company that owns Ferme. The letter, an original not a copy, contains incriminating information that proves Ferme is cutting costs in the safety department: this is exactly what the court case Mr. Gundersen is involved in is about-Ferme cutting the safety budget and the effects of doing so. Realizing this is an incredible stroke of luck, Jann Brooks (MMTC) calls Mr. Gundersen to inform him of her find. A second meeting is arranged between Jann Brooks and Mr. Gundersen.


At the second meeting Mr. Gundersen refuses a copy of the incriminating letter and insists on having the original. When MMTC refuses to turn over the original, Mr. Gundersen attempts to snatch the letter from her hand. Unsuccessful in his brazen attempt to take the original letter by force, Mr. Gundersen says he does not want a copy and is no longer interested in the information. The meeting ends.


This all caused me quite a bit of angst: I could say nothing as it is all hearsay to me but I kept asking myself: why would Mr. Russell and Jann Brooks remain quiet on such blockbuster information so critical to the anti-nuclear movement? The story would likely have ended here if it were not for my wife who, after hearing me grumble and complain for 2-3 weeks about the whole situation wrote Jann Brooks (MMTC) in an attempt to find out what the truth was.

1 deb to mmtc letter

In her response Jann Brooks tells a completely different story: she did meet with Arnie Gundersen, the meeting was amicable, and AG parts with the documentation without incident.

Note that in my wife’s letter she does not name the name of the source of the story, but a) MMTC must know it is Mr. Russell who she knows I have semi-regular phone conversations with and who she does as well and b) MMTC immediately forwards my wife’s letter to Mr. Russell (who forwards it to me and to Kevin Blanch) so that he is aware of the situation. To be sure, MMTC was quick to let the cat out of the bag and seemed not to be worried at all that someone was spreading such outrageous rumors about her and Mr. Gundersen (in fact this last week Jann Brooks friended Mr.  Russel on Facebook). Interestingly enough, any chance to observe Mr. Russell’s future actions without him knowing about what I had found out was ruined when MMTC made him immediately aware. Also, there was mention of a late night phone call with MMTC the night she forwarded my wife’s letter to Mr. Russell but I never could get Mr. Russell to tell me what the phone call was about.

Realizing that the ‘cat was out of the bag’ I confronted Mr. Russell with this information and began asking questions.

2 BS

6 BS

9 BS


As of yet, I have NOT received a proper answer from any of the persons involved in this case. Instead, a campaign of baseless attacks and slander has been mounted against me by everyone involved.


1 Jrae

2 jrae 3 jrae

(below) Certain person=Christina Consolo aka: RadChick

shazzam on mmtc and radchick

Update: (2/21/14) In a message to my wife on FaceBook Kevin Blanch now admits the fantastic tale of Arnie Gundersen DID COME FROM JANN BROOKS. Interestingly enough, Mr. Blanch has sat on this fact for weeks while Jann Brooks, Shane Russell and others attacked and slandered me in what appears to be an orchestrated effort (including Mr.Blanch’s video cursing at me and calling me a shill). Why did Mr. Blanch keep quiet when he knew the whole time that Jann Brooks was the origin of the fabricated story? What kind of person(s) act in such a deceptive manner? Was the fantastic tale of Arnie Gundersen an attempt to bait me into reporting on something I had no proof of?  Imagine if I had been stupid enough to write an article or post a video telling the Jann Brooks story of drunken Arnie trying to snatch the documents from her hand…could Mr. Gundersen then have sued me for slander or defamation of character?

Again, Jann Brooks is angry with me for ‘attacking’ her, but all I did was ask about the fantastic tale of Arnie Gundersen and it was never an attack, I never used vulgarity or harsh tones…only asked questions TO WHICH THEY ALL KNEW THE ANSWSER BUT DID THEIR BEST TO OBFUSCATE MY INVESTIGATION.

“…I repeated the story Jann told me to Shane in a very innocent way…” ~Kevin Blanch 2/21/14

It is important to note that 1) Jann Brooks finances Mr. Blanch and 2) although Mr. Blanch says that “Gundersen is worthless” his ‘Post Ignorance’ website links to an article that quotes and promotes Arnie Gundersen AND the Unit 4 offload hoax. This fact was brought to Mr. Blanches attention over a month ago.

Again, I hope you understand that the fantastic tale of Arnie Gundersen is not some ‘innocent’ story being told for fun and games. I have been very effective at debunking Arnie Gundersen and it is widely known that as a result I (and my wife for that matter) have been blacklisted from groups like the Coalition Against Nuclear and InfoWars…places that Arnie is welcome but because I have pointed out the fact he downplays and dismisses the NRC FOIAs I am banned for life. I’ve no doubt that Mr. Gundersen would like to see me silenced. Remember that with the help of Michael C. Ruppert, I forced Mr. Gundersen to address the contents of the NRC FOIAs…this is how I debunked him. Could it be possible that Jann Brooks works for Mr. Gundersen? We know she meets with Mr. Gundersen personally and she continues to host his videos even after I have thoroughly debunked Mr. Gundersen and explained how controlled opposition works. If Mr. Blanch is financed by Jann Brooks and Jann Brooks takes her orders from Mr. Gundersen it all begins to make sense. This would explain why Mr. Blanch knew the whole time that Jann Brooks was the originator of the story but chose to not only remain silent, but to attack and slander me in a video and call me a shill.

Here is a link to my free book on controlled opposition…please take the time to read so you can identify the troll dens and shill networks for yourself.

“The new freedom of expression brought by the Internet goes far beyond politics. People relate to each other in new ways, posing questions about how we should respond to people when all that we know about them is what we have learned through a medium that permits all kinds of anonymity and deception.” ~Peter Singer 

Final Words:


I hope all of you will understand that this is the FOURTH time that this has happened to me, that is to say, I feel my confidence was gained by someone in an effort to later sabotage my credibility or control some aspect of my work. In each instance I have been careful to document everything that happened. I have written multiple articles in an effort to keep the public aware. I hope you understand that once again, a pattern I recognize has unfolded before my eyes and I must be cautious and protect myself and my work. I have no choice but to disassociate myself from these characters.

Finally, I am not going to stop extending trust to people. If consequently you trick, deceive or lie to me, I see the fault as being yours, not mine. Normal humans love and trust one another. I want to remain a normal human. ~HP


Related article by Glenn Greenwald:  How Covert Agents Infiltrate the Internet to Manipulate, Deceive, and Destroy Reputations



Alternative Media Meltdown: my experiences with and an examination of controlled opposition in the United States

(click the link below to read my book in pdf form)

Alternative Media Meltdown: my experiences with and an examination of controlled opposition in the United States

(dedicated to Alexander Higgins: the man who published me when no one else would)

op alt mockingbird

Hatrick Penry exposes the Fukushima Unit 4 spent fuel offload hoax

Video: Hatrick Penry exposes the Fukushima Unit 4 spent fuel offload hoax


Watch in HD if you can.

I want to be perfectly clear: those promoting the Fukushima Unit 4 spent fuel offload hoax are ALSO the same media outlets that refuse to report on the NRC FOIA documents. Those FOIAs were being released as early as June of 2011. Follow the link to my book below to find out what these wolf-in-sheep’s-clothing media outlets are intentionally NOT reporting on. Yes, the infiltration of our media IS THAT WIDESPREAD.

The only way to beat them is for the American Public to become investigators and reporters themselves…why do we let them decide what the topic of the day will be?

TEPCO’s press release:

ABC Nightline visits Unit 4:,p0,d1

CBS News report on Unit 4 offload:

Something Wicked This Way Comes: the Story of Plume-Gate the World’s Largest Provable Cover-up in PDF:

Over 100 pages of NRC FOIA evidence that contradicts the official story of a spent fuel offload at Fukushima Unit 4 go to page 183:

Offload hoax video playlist:

NRC FOIA document 1 (used for this video):

NRC FOIA document 2 (used for this video):

Video: About Arnie Gundersen and the NRC FOIA documents

(Watch in 720p, full screen, pause to read)

According to one of the precepts to Zen Buddhism, when the need arises to be critical of a person or group I am to ask myself three things: 1) what is my motivation 2) what is the content of what I will be saying and 3) who am I speaking to?

My motive stems from a desire to save lives and prevent cancers by shutting down all nuclear power plants.The content is an examination of Mr. Arnie Gundersen’s video of 12/11/13, some of his history and connections, and a rebuttal in the form of NRC FOIA evidence and my testimony. I am speaking to anyone concerned about Fukushima, Plume-Gate or nuclear power in general.

About Mr. Gundersen: First of all he is pro-nuclear. If you want to end nuclear power, consider supporting someone who is open and vocal about systematically shutting down, decommissioning all nuclear plants and dry-casking the fuel as soon as possible.This is simple logic.

Now, ask yourself why none of these groups or people did what I did to expose what is in the NRC FOIA documents? Why have they not ‘showcased’ or ‘highlighted’  Plume-Gate or the items on my 12 point list? Why do they promote the Unit 4 spent fuel offload hoax? Why did Arnie Gundersen ‘accidentally’ post redacted documents online he was allowed to see in the San Onofre case, almost having it thrown out of court?

Understand the job of controlled opposition. They want you to go to THEIR website, to THEIR documents and to THEIR disinformation (90% accurate/10% bunk). They want you to follow their ‘truthers’ and their ‘alternative’ media figureheads. They will not expose the worst-of-the-worst. They want to slow down the flow of information. It’s a hoax. A con job. Always consider the billions and billions of dollars at the disposal of the energy companies. FOLLOW THE MONEY.

Here is an article on Entergy spending millions to convince the public that relicensing Indian Point NPP is a good thing to do (yes it is an NRC FOIA document where you can see they are concerned about who is writing what about nuclear power).

Fukushima Unit 4 hoax underway

Final analysis on Unit 4 hoax, evidence on Unit 3, Plume-Gate highlights

Achilles Heel: 13 Reasons why Establishment Forces Utilize Controlled Opposition

“Operation Mockingbird Style Alternative Media Infiltration Exposed!!!”

Here is my article on controlled opposition…learn my methods for identifying the shill networks “Operation Mockingbird Style YouTube and FaceBook Infiltrations Exposed!!!”

Something Wicked This Way Comes: The story of Plume-Gate, the world’s largest, provable cover-up (every point in my 12 point list can be found here with documentation)

Believe Mr. Gundersen or see for yourself… “Fear and Loathing on Fukushima Unit 4″ page 181 :

May 11th, 2012 prisonplanet complete episode:

Arnie Gundersen’s video of 12/11/13

Video: Unit 4 Hoax underway

Video: Unit 4 Hoax underway

“The Matrix is the world that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth.” ~Morpheus

“For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence—on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.  Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed.” ~John F. Kennedy April 27th, 1961

BBC article:

TEPCO report from 11/18/13:

TEPCO handout with pictures:

The ultimate collection of NRC FOIA information on Unit 4….Fear and Loathing on Fukushima Unit 4:

See for yourself….the NRC FOIA documents pertaining to Fukushima:

Something Wicked This Way Comes: The story of Plume-Gate, the world’s largest, provable cover-up:

Achilles Heel: 13 Reasons why Establishment Forces Utilize Controlled Opposition


Achilles Heel: 13 Reasons why Establishment Forces Utilize Controlled Opposition

By Hatrick ‘Hattie’ Penry


“There are fake enmities between fake shows, and a circuit of ‘actors’ and shills posing as informants or experts or former government agents; all the while leading the ‘former’ sheep around in circles and in the opposite direction of the most important things they need to know.” ~From my article Operation Mockingbird Style Alternative Media Infiltration Exposed!!! 

(below) ABC News and InfoWars logo similarities

33 logo similarities

It was not until I broke the Plume-Gate story, back in February of 2012, that I began to realize what controlled opposition was, or even that it existed. The idea that someone or some organization would hire a person or group of persons to attack them, intentionally, sounds absurd. But once you examine the concept of controlled opposition, once you have direct contact with them, once you understand their methods, tactics and strategy, then you can clearly see that controlled opposition is singularly the most important tool in the toolbox of the establishment. In the case of Plume-Gate, the multi-agency conspiracy to conceal and cover-up Fukushima’s radioactive plume and fallout from Americans, I found that there was a massive effort underway, amongst controlled opposition propaganda outlets, to cover-up the cover-up.

As it turned out, I was not the only FOIA researcher who was forwarding the evidence of Plume-Gate around to ‘alternative’ media outlets such as Alex Jones’ InfoWars. And as it turned out, I was not the only FOIA researcher whose evidence was being ignored. Enter the concept of controlled opposition. Enter the term ‘gatekeeping’ or ‘gatekeeper’. I realized there were some things that Alex Jones, and many, many other so-called ‘alternative’ media outlets for that matter, would not talk about. For all intents and purposes, it appeared to me that Operation Mockingbird had spilled over into the alternative media. It wasn’t long before I concluded that FaceBook and YouTube were also under the sway of controlled opposition outlets as well.

(below) Arnie Gundersen of admits he has read the NRC FOIA documents but has chosen to remain silent on the ‘silver bullet’ cover-up found within. 

aaa arnie gundersshill

“Propaganda outlets often use a ‘honey-trap’ article/video to lure unsuspecting readers to their website where the bulk of disinformation awaits them. This one rare article, the one that is largely relevant and truthful, is more a recruiting tool than anything else.” ~From my article Operation Mockingbird Style YouTube and FaceBook Infiltrations Exposed!

Since then I have come to understand that our ignorance of the concept of controlled opposition is our greatest weakness. It is the Achilles Heel of any truth movement, of any form of media that seeks to report the facts. I want you to be able to understand their methods, tactics and strategy, so you can identify who the controlled opposition is for yourself. Once we know who the imposters are, we can begin to replace them with grass-roots reporters who have allegiance only to the American Public. It is true that we have been fooled by confidence tricksters and con-men and we have willingly given our power over to those who do not have our best interests at heart. But it is also true that we don’t have to just stand by idly and let them take advantage of us. We can and we must do something about it. To change this dynamic, you will have no choice but to get involved. You must help to replace the controlled opposition. And remember, you are better than Alex Jones because you will tell the truth, the whole truth, nothing but the truth and you will tell it as soon as you have the information!

Please keep in mind that controlled opposition outlets look and sound very much like you and I. They must appear as you and I do and they must use our rhetoric because their job is to infiltrate. They are imposters, they are wolfs-in-sheep’s-clothing, they are doppelgangers. If you don’t know what to look for it is not easy to recognize controlled opposition…because it’s not supposed to be! If however, you know what to look for and you look with an open mind, you can identify controlled opposition quite easily…and once you know who they are you can remove and replace them. This is how the American Public will retake all sectors of media. It is the only way if stories like Plume-Gate are to win the attention they deserve.

cia controls media

13 Reasons why Establishment Forces Utilize Controlled Opposition:

1)      Controlled Opposition fools you into thinking someone is already fighting the good fight for you. You won’t have to work as hard, or maybe even at all, because Alex Jones or Jeff Rense or Adam Kokesh is doing it for you. The premise here is simple: the real army won’t go to war if it thinks another is fighting in its place. Convincing you to stand down, to not get involved because you perceive you are not needed, is one of their greatest tricks.

2)      Controlled Opposition appears to be waging a battle against problem or person X. When the time is right, the ball will be dropped at a crucial point of the game, leaving the ‘enemy’ to win the day. Think of a prize fighter who has been paid to ‘take a fall’ in the 3rd round. This can even take the form of a lawsuit wherein the plaintiff will intentionally lose the case. When controlled opposition sues in court it serves the dual purpose of fooling others into thinking someone is already suing for that particular issue/matter and causing them not to engage in what they perceive would be duplicate litigation (see also #1 above).

3)      Controlled opposition can be made to ‘look crazy’ at some point in the game. This can be used to discredit the real movement and genuine figureheads. When Alex Jones waves his fists around in the air and rants and raves as loud as he can it makes all ‘conspiracy theorists’ (or 2nd amendment supporters when Mr. Jones ‘flipped out’ on Piers Morgan) look bad. Think of the premise of ‘guilt by association’.

4)      Controlled opposition can be selective about what they report on. Think about how long the NRC FOIA documents pertaining to Fukushima have been available (July 2011) and then think about how few have actually reported on them. Sometimes the gangrenous toe is cut off to save the leg, in a manner of speaking: Fast and Furious is allowed but Plume-Gate is not. ‘Gatekeeping’ is the number one task of controlled opposition outlets. They sucker you in with small, truthful complaints, and then remain silent on the blockbuster issues. Maybe this is why you never heard of Plume-Gate or the 5,200 Pentagon/DOD child porn viewers of which dozens had Top Secret clearances?

5)      Controlled opposition controls the topic of the day. Once media has been saturated with controlled propaganda outlets, the fact that so many are discussing subject X means that more often than not, this subject is considered by the masses to be the topic of the day…after all, everyone is talking about it right? Mainstream is excellent example of this: ABC, CBS, NBC, FOX, CNN and others all promote the topics they want to promote. They set the tone. They decide the subject (see also #4 above).

6)      Controlled opposition promotes disinformation and fear mongering. How many times will they promote the passage of Planet X? Or the Fukushima Unit 4 spent fuel pool doomsday scenario? After gaining the public’s confidence, propagandist outlets are able to ‘muddy the waters’ by promoting bogus information along with legitimate information. Keeping society in a heightened state of fear (a symptom of certain disinformation) is another important aspect of what controlled opposition does. If you believe that Planet X is about to destroy the Earth, or that Y2K is the end of civilization as we know it, you simply won’t have time to be worried about Chem-Trails, Plume-Gate or any other problem other than that of surviving the imaginary doomsday scenario.

7)      Controlled opposition promotes diversions and runs Psy-Ops (psychological operations). A diversion could be anything from Charlie Sheen ‘freaking out’ while being interviewed by Alex Jones or something as simple as a ‘troll fight’ between controlled opposition agents on YouTube (hearken back to the Dutchsinse vs. Prophetic Seer and Dutchsinse vs. Suspicious0bservers troll fights on YouTube…what an excellent diversion from the one subject that none of them would talk about: the Plume-Gate cover-up). Psy-Ops are any operation or operations meant to persuade, change, or influence the population at large. Intimidation is a big part of modern psychological warfare. Possible scenarios might include a ‘truther’ being arrested for posting harsh words online or a reporter meeting an untimely fate (car explodes?) for being close to revealing something about Obama or the CIA. None of the situations would be real, the character(s) involved would essentially be actors fulfilling their role in a theatrical performance, made genuine and promoted by controlled opposition outlets everywhere, with the intended effect of intimidating you and keeping you from getting involved. Think of the Manning and Snowden cases. If you take them at face value, they are both stories of how you can get some serious jail time for speaking out against your government. And yet neither of these characters has revealed anything as serious as what I have in the Plume-Gate case and neither character has revealed the fact that a massive controlled opposition disinformation ring is operating with impunity all over the United States. Is this just an attempt to scare off legitimate whistle-blowers who might have legitimate information? It is important to note that when undercover agents (sockpuppet and troll accounts included) manipulate, groom or influence the threads beneath videos and articles, whether the video or story is of their own creation or not, this is essentially a psychological operation meant to persuade, change or influence your opinion.

aj mark dice batman slaps robin

8)      Controlled Opposition performs data collection and information retrieval. They want to know what you know and when you know it. When you send them your article or information they not only ignore it, they file it away in your file under what you know. Yes, in your file. The comments you made about tipping over a FEMA truck in the PrisonPlanet threads are now in your file. Were you influenced by similar talk that came from an undercover controlled opposition agent whose job is to haunt the threads and incite others to use violent rhetoric so that it may be later used against you? Something to think about.

9)      Controlled opposition can promote a bogus story as legitimate then discredit those who supported it by having controlled opposition agents, at a time of their choosing, discredit the information completely. This is called a ‘honey-trap’. Remember the ‘LIBOR shooter hoax’? Propagandists under establishment control promoted a story that claimed the Aurora and Sandy Hook shooters’ fathers were due to testify in the LIBOR scandal. It was later debunked but not until enough suckers had jumped on-board and blindly supported it without fact checking the story. Those that ran with the bogus story ended up looking incompetent and untrustworthy. Recently I debunked (with assistance) the Pattie Brassard doomsday hoax that was an orchestrated attempt to discredit ‘conspiracy theorists’ with a similar ‘honey trap’ scenario.

10)   Controlled opposition practices mind control and social engineering. For example: if you want to divide the police/army from civilians you have your controlled opposition outlets run only articles and videos that shine a negative light on police and military. Have you noticed all the ‘bad cop beats down innocent person’ videos but none (or very few by comparison) that show police doing good deeds and good works? Let’s not forget the Alex Jones ‘drone shoot down video’ and Mike Adams of NaturalNews calling for an armed citizen’s arrest of DNR officials in Michigan. This is an attempt to incite lawlessness and criminality. It is intentional. It is planned.

11)   Controlled opposition controls the airwaves and consequently, who is allowed to be seen by the American public. Undercover agents (commonly known as ‘shills’) speaking on behalf of the establishment can be given VIP access to the lights, camera and action. Those with genuine information can be blacklisted, just as I was from PrisonPlanet over the Plume-Gate cover-up back in May of 2012. When you control who is allowed to be seen by the public you not only control the topic of conversation, but you tend to add legitimacy to those who are promoted and you tend to discredit those that never have access…after all, if what they were talking about was important, they would eventually be interviewed by InfoWars, right?

12)   Controlled opposition has the vampire-like ability to drain energy, especially in the form of finances, from those that oppose establishment forces. When you donate money to or buy merchandise from controlled opposition outlets you help them while hurting yourself. That money might have been used to purchase a new video camera or laptop that would aid in your ability to fight the information war. It is also important to note that time is another valuable asset that controlled opposition wants to sap from you. How many hours did you spend on another pointless InfoWars poster contest?


13)   Controlled opposition offers no solutions or ‘solutions’ that never go anywhere. Like the poster contest mentioned above, most of what the propaganda outlets offer in the way of solutions are a complete waste of time (see also #12 above). Obvious solutions that have a chance of working are ignored. Have you heard Alex Jones endorse, promote or talk about the boycott of aluminum to stop Chem-Trails? Of course not…boycotts work!

At the end of the day, the public at large must understand, identify and replace controlled opposition outlets and figureheads or blockbuster stories such as Plume-Gate will never come to light to the degree they should. Senator Morse of Oregon once stated (I am paraphrasing) that given the facts, the American public could make the right decision. The problem, Morse went on to say, was that the government would not give the American public the facts. With the help of controlled opposition this is still true to this day. Remember that they only have to fool most of the people most of the time. Controlled opposition is how they are doing it.

Other articles on controlled opposition:

Operation Mockingbird Style Alternative Media Infiltration Exposed!!!

Operation Mockingbird Style YouTube and FaceBook Infiltrations Exposed!!!

Analysis of Selections from the ‘Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion’ relating to control of the press

Author’s note: names of ‘alternative’ media figureheads mentioned as controlled opposition in this article are all guilty of gatekeeping on Plume-Gate: learn more by reading : Something Wicked This Way Comes: The story of Plume-Gate, the world’s largest, provable cover-up and Fear and Loathing on Fukushima Unit 4




3 Strikes and You’re Out: Ed Chiarini aka: dallasgoldbug blows his cover


3 Strikes and You’re Out: Ed Chiarini aka: dallasgoldbug blows his cover

by Hatrick Penry


ed chiarini agd admits works for jones


First, Ed said I was an actor playing 4 different people:

ed 1

Actually, make that 5 different people if you count the ‘Lady Sophie Windsor’ connection!

ed chiarini comment

Then I revealed I am 6 foot 7 inches tall and exposed Ed as a fraud:

ed 2

Then Ed had to recant his bogus claims but instead of apologizing or slinking away back under some rock, Ed thought it would be wise to claim I am the boyfriend of ‘Jeff Tremaine’…my wife thinks this is funny!

ed 3

Then I exposed Ed in a video and debunked him in 3 1/2 minutes…I would like to show you the video but Ed and his agent friends have had EACH AND EVERY VIDEO I MAKE EXPOSING HIM FLAGGED AS INAPPROPRIATE CONTENT ON BOTH YOUTUBE AND VIMEO!!!

rejected 0 rejected 1 rejected 2 rejected 3 rejected 4 replace rejected 5 replace

“I tried to reach out Dallas Gold Bug at the beginning of the year cause I thought he was a good guy, but when I told him about what Alex Jones’s role in my husbands case, Dallas Gold Booger, decided not to contact me, but to claim I was 3 or 4 other people whom I had no idea whom they were.” ~DVM

After this, Ed came on YouTube under another name, and since I was asking folks to help Alexander Higgins rebuild his home after it was destroyed by Hurricane Sandy, Ed thought it would be nice to slander me and claim I was running an ‘eastcoast paypal scam’…again, the video I create to debunk this is flagged by Ed and his agent friends on YouTube AND Vimeo.

zz liar

(one of Ed’s many YouTube channels and one he slandered me from)

Ed is not near finished yet, check out this series of messages sent to me about some more slandering Ed Chiarini has been doing….Krike! If this guy ain’t Federally protected I don’t know who is!

dgb screws up  again 1 - Copy

dgb screws up again 2 - Copy

Update: 6.7.13

Now if this is not enough, Ed has yet again named me as another person, one Jeff Hollock from Austin Texas and claims I have 3 brothers and a sister!!! (I have one brother alive and one deceased…never had a sister but always thought it might be cool to have one.)

ed 7

Update 8.17.13

The mail must be slow…Ed’s ‘lawsuit’ from June 7th, 2013 has failed to issue a subpoena to me…maybe Ed got the wrong address?

ed chi is fed up

About Ed’s job for the NWO:

I don’t care if Ed Chiarini says I am 4 different people and I don’t care what others think of me. I do care that you read the articles and stories I have written because I want you to think…and think again. Let my works speak for me…please.

About Ed: His job is an important one for the establishment and that is to poison the well of information and scare legitimate truth-seekers away. If you are searching for the truth you will eventually come across the concept of a ‘False Flag’: dallasgoldbug wants you to think they are all a hoax.

Ed Chiarini aka: dallasgoldbug serves several purposes:

1) muddying the waters of information

2) distraction/diversion from important subjects such as Plume-Gate and the NRC FOIA Documents.

3) promotion of the ‘hoax’ conspiracy theory. If you think the Sandy Hook massacre was a hoax you will assume the children were never killed. They’re still alive somewhere. Maybe its not so bad. At least no one died, right? The same goes for Ed’s versions of the Loughner shooting and the Aurora massacre. Better you think it’s a hoax than an MK-Ultra style killing meant to further the NWO agenda.

4) Ed is an online ‘hitman’ and character assassin. He is Federally protected so he has the freedom to slander and attack those who threaten the establishment and does so with impunity. Most folks are not mentally prepared to deal with the likes of Ed and are easily scared away or just plain discouraged from further investigating certain conspiracy theories.

Consider how the 1st herd of sheeple (the ones who watch mainstream news etc.) will react to the likes of dallasgoldbug: he makes conspiracy scientists look like fools. Ed frightens the 1st herd away from joining the 2nd herd.

Now consider Ed’s effect on the 2nd herd (who think they have awakened from the mainstream media nightmare, but a trap has beeen laid for them in the alternative and independent media): they don’t know if the shooting was real or a hoax. This is paralyzing. They are now so confused as to be unable to act on the matter or come to a conclusion about what happened.

History: Ed’s claim to fame is his take on the Giffords shooting (that it was staged with actors) as a hoax. How do you hoax the side of someones head being shot with a gun?

Also note: Ron Paul, Bill Cooper and others have been pictured alongside other people on Ed’s website and in his videos and the insinuation made that they are one and the same, an actor playing two or more roles. But when you take a look at the Ron Paul/Ian McKellan or Bill Cooper/ Jordan Maxwell matches you know he’s either legally blind, insane or purposefully making an obvious mismatch in an effort to discredit his earlier videos and theories. Was Ed a genuine ‘truther’ before someone ‘got to him’? I can’t tell you that but what I can tell you is that trust is something that takes a long time to build and Ed has certainly ruined his credibility with me and many others he has slandered as well…the list has become quite long now, as evidenced by countless videos on YouTube saying pretty much the same thing you have read here.

“Take heed what ye hear: with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you: and unto you that hear shall more be given.” ~Yahusha (Mark 4:24)

Some background and history on Ed Chiarini aka: dallasgoldbug

ed 5 ed 6 

final note:

1) If Ed does this to you SPEAK OUT ABOUT IT!!! The number of videos and articles debunking Ed Chiarini aka: dallasgoldbug are growing everyday as he continues to attack and slander those of us exposing critical subjects like Plume-Gate, the world’s largest, provable, cover-up with over 65,000+ estimated American fatalities. A day will come when Ed’s reputation will be so tarnished only the mentally disturbed will pay him any attention. It will take all of us working together to do this. PLEASE SPEAK OUT AND THANKS TO THOSE WHO ALREADY HAVE!!!





ed virus